Antecedents of knowledge sharing in communities of practice

Author:

Zboralski Katja

Abstract

PurposeCommunities of practice (CoPs) have gained a great deal of attention from practitioners and scholars alike. However, critical antecedents of knowledge sharing in CoPs have not been fully researched yet. Particularly, empirical results are still scarce. The aim of this paper is to analyse the role of community members' motivation to participate in CoPs, the importance of the community leader and the influence of management support.Design/methodology/approachIn order to test the proposed hypotheses data from 222 CoP members from different communities of a multinational company gathered in a large sample quantitative survey, using partial least square structural equations modelling.FindingsThe research results show that a leading facilitator and an appropriate managerial support influence interaction processes in CoPs positively.Research limitations/implicationsThe impact of motivational and managerial factors on knowledge sharing processes in CoPs is conceptualized and tested. With regard to further CoP research, the developed scales may serve as a basis for future empirical studies. Furthermore, the type of knowledge handled in the CoP as well as assessments from community leaders could enhance the understanding of learning and knowledge generation in CoPs.Practical implicationsNew insights with respect to the management of CoPs in corporate practice, answering questions such as “What motivates people to participate in CoPs?” or “How to lead knowledge workers in CoPs?” are found.Originality/valueOn the basis of a large sample empirical analysis these research results give evidence for the importance of different antecedents of interaction processes in CoPs.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference52 articles.

1. Allen, T.J. and Cooney, S. (1973), “Institutional roles in technology transfer: a diagnosis of the situation in one small country”, R&D Management, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 41‐51.

2. Andriessen, J.H.E. and Verburg, R.M. (2004), “The development and application of the community assessment toolkit”, paper presented at 5th European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, Innsbruck.

3. APQC (2000), Building and Sustaining Communities of Practice: Final Report, American Productivity & Quality Center, Houston, TX.

4. Ardichvili, A., Page, V. and Wentling, T. (2003), “Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge‐sharing communities of practice”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7 No. 1.

5. Belsley, D.A. (1991), Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

Cited by 96 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3