WEB 2.0 implications on knowledge management

Author:

Levy Moria

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide an understanding of the WEB 2.0 phenomenon and its implications on knowledge management; thus, in order to learn whether using WEB 2.0 concepts and tools can yield better assimilation of knowledge management in organizations.Design/methodology/approachA range of recently published articles regarding WEB 2.0, Enterprise 2.0 and KM 2.0 are examined and critiqued (2005‐2007). These are analyzed and compared to knowledge management principles and attributes as known and learned from works defining the sharing of knowledge in organizations (1995‐2005). The sources are divided into three basic elements: The Internet (WEB 2.0), the organizational implementation (Enterprise 2.0) and the organizational implementation of knowledge sharing (KM2.0).FindingsWEB 2.0 is very close in its principles and attributes to knowledge management. WEB 2.0 should affect knowledge management in organizations; yet, it cannot be copied, as differences between the two will not enable organizations to benefit from such. In the first stage, tools can be adopted, and in further stages, deeper aspects such as active users' participation will be followed.Practical implicationsOrganizations are encouraged to start using WIKI's and in some cases also blogs. Knowledge Managers should examine if younger employees can serve as knowledge catalysts. WEB 2.0 concepts should be tested as to organization's maturity, to decide if they can be adopted as part of the organizational knowledge sharing.Originality/valueThis paper analyzes an important issue whether better assimilation of knowledge management can exist triggered by the WEB 2.0 phenomenon. It is unique in its broad analysis of the three related terms – WEB 2.0, Enterprise 2.0 and KM2.0.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference35 articles.

1. Cardarelli, M. (2007), “Is ‘knowledge management’ dead?”, available at: http://blogs.officezealot.com/mauro/archive/2007/01/01/20005.aspx (accesed 9 April 2007).

2. Carswell, S. (2007), “The 100% guaranteed easiest way to enterprise 2.0? – Talkback”, available at: http://theobvious.typepad.com/blog/2007/03/the_100_guarant.html (accessed 15 March 2007).

3. Cleaver, M. (2006), “Knowledge management is dead. Long live knowledge management”, available at: http://martin.cleaver.org/blog/2006/11/20/knowledge‐management‐is‐dead‐long‐live‐knowledge‐management/ (accessed 13 March 2007).

4. Cleaver, M. (2007), “Knowledge management revisited: Enterprise 2.0”, available at: http://martin.cleaver.org/blog/2007/03/04/knowledge‐management‐revisited‐enterprise‐20/ (accessed 13 March 2007).

5. Dale, S. (2007), “Knowledge management (KM) and social computing – are they the same?”, available at: http://dissident.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/04/knowledge_manag.html (accessed 2 April 2007).

Cited by 237 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3