Organizing knowledge in the knowledge development cycle

Author:

Bhatt Ganesh D.

Abstract

The main aim of the paper is to examine some of the strategies that can be matched to increase the effectiveness of the knowledge development cycle. In manufacturing and operational works, the effectiveness of different organizing strategies to enhance the quality of manufacturing processes and products is well established. In knowledge works, however, we lack such frameworks. Unlike manufacturing and operational processes, knowledge development processes are often chaotic, unstructured, and unsystematic, resulting in intangible products. Therefore, the principles of manufacturing strategies cannot be applied in the knowledge development cycle. In knowledge works, organizing strategies should be defined and initiated based on knowledge development phases (e.g. knowledge creation, knowledge adoption, knowledge distribution, and knowledge review and revision). Each phase, in the knowledge development cycle, needs to be evaluated in context of its characteristics on repetition, standardization, reliability, and specifications.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference50 articles.

1. Adler, P. (1989), “Technology strategy: guide to the literature”, in Rosenbloom, R.S. and Burgelman, R.A. (Eds), Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 1‐25.

2. Adler, P.S., Goldoftas, B. and Levine, D.I. (1999), “Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system”, Organization Science, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 43‐68.

3. Aoki, M. (1988), Information, Incentives, and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

4. Argyris, C. and Schon, D.A. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison‐Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA.

5. Ashby, W.R. (1956), An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman & Hall, London.

Cited by 133 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The mediation effect of innovativeness on knowledge application and organizational innovation: Case of Tunisian companies;International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478);2024-02-18

2. Synchronizing Transitional Pace;Palgrave Studies of Entrepreneurship and Social Challenges in Developing Economies;2024

3. The influence of motivations to share knowledge in preventing knowledge sabotage occurrences: An empirically tested motivational model;Technological Forecasting and Social Change;2023-07

4. A Learning Framework for Supporting Digital Innovation Hubs;Computers;2023-06-15

5. İŞLETME YÖNETİM KARARLARINDA MUHASEBE BİLGİ SİSTEMİNİN ETKİSİ VE ÖRNEK BİR UYGULAMA;ASSAM Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi;2023-04-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3