Creating knowledge networks: lessons from practice

Author:

Schönström Mikael

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the research is to study the set‐up processes of formal networks in a multinational high‐tech corporation consisting of multiple business units. The aim is to learn more about what management can do in order to support the fragile process of setting up new knowledge networks.Design/methodology/approachThe research project had a problem‐solving approach, which is why action research was selected as the method.FindingsBased on the research the following findings are discussed: identify and support knowledge activists, put knowledge networks on the strategic agenda, formal networks being vulnerable to major organizational changes, create an understanding for how formal networks can coexist with the line organization.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations of the study relate to the fact that the knowledge networks were set up within the same company. That the knowledge networks were set up during a turbulent time when cost reductions were a top priority may also limit the generalizability of the findings.Practical implicationsThe findings of the research can help managers to set up a knowledge network successfully. If management is aware of the issues that could be encountered in a knowledge network set‐up, the chances for a successful knowledge network implementation will be enhanced.Originality/valueSystematic research regarding the actual process of a knowledge network set‐up is lacking. This research fills this gap by the practical characteristics of the research project and its practical implications for management.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference30 articles.

1. Baskerville, R.L. (1999), “Investigating information systems with action research”, Communications of the AIS, Vol. 2, art. 19.

2. Baskerville, R.L. and Wood‐Harper, A.T. (1996), “A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research”, Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 11, pp. 235‐46.

3. Boland, R.J. and Tenkasi, R.V. (1995), “Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing”, Organization Science, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 350‐72.

4. Buchel, B. and Raub, S. (2002), “Building knowledge‐creating value networks”, European Management Journal, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 587‐96.

5. Danneels, E. (2002), “The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, pp. 1095‐121.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3