Integrating knowledge management technologies in organizational business processes: getting real time enterprises to deliver real business performance

Author:

Malhotra Yogesh

Abstract

PurposeTo provide executives and scholars with pragmatic understanding about integrating knowledge management strategy and technologies in business processes for successful performance.Design/methodology/approachA comprehensive review of theory, research, and practices on knowledge management develops a framework that contrasts existing technology‐push models with proposed strategy‐pull models. The framework explains how the “critical gaps” between technology inputs, related knowledge processes, and business performance outcomes can be bridged for the two types of models. Illustrative case studies of real‐time enterprise (RTE) business model designs for both successful and unsuccessful companies are used to provide real world understanding of the proposed framework.FindingsSuggests superiority of strategy‐pull models made feasible by new “plug‐and‐play” information and communication technologies over the traditional technology‐push models. Critical importance of strategic execution in guiding the design of enterprise knowledge processes as well as selection and implementation of related technologies is explained.Research limitations/implicationsGiven the limited number of cases, the framework is based on real world evidence about companies most popularized for real time technologies by some technology analysts. This limited sample helps understand the caveats in analysts' advice by highlighting the critical importance of strategic execution over selection of specific technologies. However, the framework needs to be tested with multiple enterprises to determine the contingencies that may be relevant to its application.Originality/valueThe first comprehensive analysis relating knowledge management and its integration into enterprise business processes for achieving agility and adaptability often associated with the “real time enterprise” business models. It constitutes critical knowledge for organizations that must depend on information and communication technologies for increasing strategic agility and adaptability.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference108 articles.

1. Ackoff, R. (1979), “The future of operations research is past”, Journal of the Operations Research Society, Vol. 30, p. 93.

2. Argyris, C. (1990), Integrating the Individual and the Organization, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ.

3. Argyris, C. (1994), “Good communication that blocks learning”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72 No. 4, pp. 77‐85.

4. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. (2001), “Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 107‐36.

5. Alinean (2002), “Alinean identifies why certain companies achieve higher ROI from IT investments”, available at: www.alinean.com.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3