Author:
Shani A.B. (Rami),Sena James A.,Stebbins Michael W.
Abstract
The goal of boosting creativity and productivity in knowledge‐based teams is shared by managers in technology‐oriented companies and industries. In this paper, we assess the nature of team performance and creativity in the context of computer‐supported technology. A field study of a Seagate Software project team provided the basis for the examination of four sub‐ teams’ overall functioning and creativity. Factors considered included technology support, team member relationships, decision making, performance and meeting deadlines, attention to quality, and innovation and creativity. Results varied, revealing less reliance on computer‐aided support and more on social support. Creativity was recognized and supported, but at times hampered.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management
Reference36 articles.
1. Amabile, T.M. (1988), “A model of creativity and innovation in organization”, in Staw, B.M. and Cummings, L.L. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 123‐67.
2. Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. and Herron, M. (1996), “Assessing the work environment for creativity”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 1154‐84.
3. Applegate, L.M. (1991), “Technology support for cooperative work”, Journal of Organizational Computing, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 11‐40.
4. Bair, J.H. (1991), “A layered model of organizations: communication processes and performance”, Journal of Organizational Computing, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 187‐203.
5. Coleman, D. (1999), “Groupware: collaboration and knowledge sharing”, in Liebowitz, J. (Ed.), Knowledge Management Handbook, Vol. 12 No. 1, CRC Press, New York, NY, pp. 12‐15.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献