Knowledge management capability: defining knowledge assets

Author:

Freeze Ronald D.,Kulkarni Uday

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to show that separate sources of knowledge are identified, described and clearly defined as organizational intangible knowledge assets. These knowledge assets are referred to as knowledge capabilities (KCs). knowledge management (KM) is utilized to leverage these assets with a view to systematic improvement in the process of achieving increased firm performance.Design/methodology/approachIn this paper knowledge capabilities are described in terms of their knowledge life cycle, tacit/implicit/explicit nature of knowledge, technology and organizational processes that encompass a firm's human capital identified as knowledge workers.FindingsThe paper finds that five knowledge capability are presented and described as expertise, lessons learned, policies and procedures, data and knowledge documents.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper shows that knowledge assets can be measured and improved in order to investigate causal relationships with identified measures of performance.Practical implicationsThe paper shows that by explicitly describing these knowledge assets, the KM activities within organizations can more effectively leverage knowledge and improve performance.Originality/valueThe paper sees that by drawing from both resource based and organizational learning literature, a knowledge management framework is presented to describe distinctly separate sources of knowledge within organizations. These knowledge sources are constructed as knowledge capabilities that can allow the assessment of organizational knowledge assets.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference34 articles.

1. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. (2001), “Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 107‐36.

2. Argote, L., McEvily, B. and Reagans, R. (2003), “Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes”, Management Science, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 571‐82.

3. Bach, C. and Belardo, S. (2003), Scientific and Philosophical Aspects of Information and the Relationships among Data, Information, and Knowledge, Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Tampa Bay, FL, pp. 2629‐39.

4. Birkinshaw, J. and Sheehan, T. (2002), “Managing the knowledge life cycle”, Mit Sloan Management Review, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 75‐83.

5. Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (2000), “Balancing act: how to capture knowledge without killing it”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 78 No. 3, p. 73‐+.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3