Abstract
Purpose
Although thematic analysis is a commonly used technique, this paper aims to explore the potential advantages (and drawbacks) of both thematic analysis and a dialogic approach to qualitative data analysis.
Design/methodology/approach
Initially, the epistemology and application of each design, thematic analysis and dialogic analysis are compared. Then, examples of coding segments of narrative data from 85 open-ended interviews with older adults exploring the meaning of place and place-attachment are presented through both thematic and dialogic analyses.
Findings
The conclusion offers suggestions about how dialogic analysis can add additional context and more participant inclusion and agency to thematic analysis.
Originality/value
The blending of these two qualitative analysis approaches offers better emphasis on fully presenting older individuals’ narratives.
Subject
Community and Home Care,Gerontology
Reference23 articles.
1. Bowers, B. (2021), “Instructions to authors”, available at: https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/pages/Instructions_To_Authors (Accessed 9 October 2021).
2. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2021
3. Race doesn’t matter: a dialogic analysis of interracial romantic partners’ stories about racial differences;Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,2017
4. Data analysis and interpretation,2017
5. The bureau of sages: incorporating older adult voice into meaningful research;Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action,2020