Evaluation of factors and approaches affecting emergency department space planning

Author:

Pascale Federica,Achour Nabil,D.F. Price Andrew,Polverino Francesco

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to evaluate emergency department (ED) design space planning approaches and draw lessons for developing more resilient and integrated ED guidelines. Two key objectives have been set; these include: exploring potential factors affecting the ED performance, and investigate how ED space planning is addressed internationally through the evaluation of international case studies and design guidelines. Design/methodology/approach – A robust research method has been adopted including comprehensive literature review in addition to 76 case studies from Italy and the USA. Findings – Findings show that the important factors in defining ED space requirements are attendance variability, vulnerable groups and mass casualty events. The study concludes that current design guidelines and approaches need to be updated to meet with the current and future demand by taking into account design performance: effectiveness, efficiency and resilience, to avoid underestimating ED space; and that the US EDs are in a better position, than Italian EDs, to increase capacity when needed. Originality/value – The contribution of this study is in providing a tangible “understanding” of factors influencing ED design and prepares a firm ground to develop more resilient and integrated design guidelines, able to meet current, exceptional and long-term needs of EDs. The study also shows that research can provide a valuable contribution to improve ED design which needs to feed more in practice to improve design process and guidelines.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference69 articles.

1. ACEM (2007), “Guidelines on emergency department design”, Australian College for Emergency Medicine, available at: www.acem.org.au/media/policies_and_guidelines/G15_ED_Design.pdf

2. ACEP (2006), “Crowding”, Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 47 No. 4, p. -.

3. ACEP (2011), “Health care system surge capacity recognition, preparedness, and response”, available at: www.acep.org/content.aspx?id=29506 (accessed 19 December 2011).

4. Achour, N. and Price, A.D.F. (2011), “Healthcare resilience to natural hazards: an achievable target (Guest Editorial)”, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment (IJDRBE), Vol. 2 No. 3.

5. Adnkronos Salute (2011), “Health care: 30 million Italians a year to the emergency room, 75% for biblical waiting time”, available at: www.adnkronos.com/IGN/Daily_Life/Benessere/Sanita-30-mln-italiani-lanno-al-pronto-soccorso-per-75-attese-bibliche_689050476.html (accessed 01 May 2011).

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3