Open innovation in the new context of proof of concepts: evidence from Italy

Author:

Passarelli Mariacarmela,Landi Giovanni Catello,Cariola AlfioORCID,Sciarelli Mauro

Abstract

PurposeThe paper aims to advance knowledge by investigating the main factors that impact on innovation through the co-development process between researchers and firms at the very early stage of proof of concept.Design/methodology/approachThe authors developed an empirical analysis on the proof of concept network project, through a mixed empirical analysis. They explored the main factors that affect the enactment of the co-development process and tested the impact of such factors on the probability for partners to enact a co-development project and generate innovation.FindingsFrom the quantitative analysis comes out that the trust of the research team into the potentiality of the technology, the commitment of researchers concerning the scalability of technology and the IP value issued by external experts have a positive impact on the probability to create a match among partners and generate innovation.Research limitations/implicationsEven if all the population of technologies (108) considered in the project implementation are analyzed, the development of the empirical analysis on a specific project within a single country represents a limitation. Future analysis will concentrate on a larger panel of proof of concept experience across Europe.Practical implicationsThe success of a co-development process between researchers and companies at the embryonic phase of the technology considers the opportunity to exploit the technologies into real products for the market.Originality/valueThis is an empirical analysis of the first Italian proof of concept implementation that deeply investigates which critical factors can enable innovation by enacting a co-development process between researchers and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference45 articles.

1. Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: a dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process;Industrial Marketing Management,2012

2. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production;The American Economic Review,1996

3. Models and methods of university technology transfer;Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship,2013

4. Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows;Journal of Economic Geography,2009

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. University-industry open innovation: main enablers and practices based on a scoping review;International Journal of Innovation Science;2024-07-16

2. Habitat de inovação em biotecnologia – elementos que constituem o ambiente de inovação;Revista de Gestão e Secretariado (Management and Administrative Professional Review);2023-06-06

3. MANAGING THE CO-CREATION PROCESS: WHEN THE CAKE DOES NOT RISE;International Journal of Innovation Management;2023-06

4. Banking relationship and research spin-offs’ life cycle: The Italian experience;Research in International Business and Finance;2023-04

5. Adopting new technologies during the crisis: An empirical analysis of agricultural sector;Technological Forecasting and Social Change;2023-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3