Abstract
PurposeThe knowledge- and Internet-based economy demands a reexamination of the accounting treatment for intangibles and a thorough understanding of the empirical evidence on this topic.Design/methodology/approachThe study reviews the literature on research and development (R&D), a specific internally developed intangible asset, using meta-analysis techniques that allow to highlight the areas of consensus and disagreement in quantitative empirical results. The literature the authors review addresses four main research questions on (1) the determinants of the decision to capitalize R&D, (2) stock market-based outcomes of capitalizing R&D, (3) firm-based outcomes related to expensing R&D and (4) stock market-based outcomes of expensing R&D.FindingsThe authors find higher value relevance of capitalized compared with expensed R&D. There is, however, little robust evidence on the determinants of the capitalization decision and the characteristics of capitalizers.Originality/valueThe authors conclude by highlighting future research that can allow accounting academics to contribute to standard setting.
Reference119 articles.
1. The value relevance of intangibles: the case of software capitalization;Journal of Accounting Research,1998
2. Market underestimation of the implications of R&D increases for future earnings: the U.S. evidence;Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,2012
3. An empirical investigation of partial effect sizes in meta-analysis of correlational data;Journal of General Psychology,2014
4. The synthesis of partial effect sizes;Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research,2013
5. The association of R&D and capital expenditures with subsequent earnings variability;Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,2007
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献