Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to counter-propose a new approach of SWOT analysis, which can be used in the strategic planning of the contemporary organizations.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper, after presenting the conceptual context of the existing (conventional) SWOT analysis, presents the existing criticism within the international literature. Then, it articulates gradually the new evolutionary and correlative SWOT analysis, by using the approaches and the literature of evolutionary economics, and the Stra.Tech.Man approach in business dynamics. In conclusion, it presents the new conceptual framework on which a new correlative SWOT analysis can be based.
Findings
Main finding of this research is that the interpretation of the conventional SWOT analysis tends to study the strengths and the weaknesses of the business with an analytical dichotomy. The conventional SWOT analysis conceptualizes, usually implicitly, the opportunities and threats of the external environment as having the same impact to all the socioeconomic agents, without exception. However, by using a correlative interpretation of SWOT analysis, we understand that the opportunities and threats are always “potential,” depending on the organization’s strategic capability to exercise its comparative strengths and weaknesses.
Originality/value
In the existing literature of SWOT analysis, despite the growing criticism, there is no critique that can give systemic and correlative answers to the articulation of business strategy in SWOT terms. The Stra.Tech.Man approach, also, is a conceptual framework to study the evolutionary adaptation of all the kinds of socioeconomic organizations.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference115 articles.
1. Meta‐SWOT: introducing a new strategic planning tool;Journal of Business Strategy,2012
2. Ahmetoglu, G., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Klinger, B. and Karcisky, T. (Eds) (2017), The Wiley Handbook of Entrepreneurship, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
3. In defence of generalized Darwinism;Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2008
4. Triggers of change: structural trajectories and production dynamics;Cambridge Journal of Economics,2014
Cited by
48 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献