Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to investigate how the inter-organizational learning (inter-OL) of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) promote intra-organizational learnings (intra-OL) and how inter- and intra-OL jointly promote organizational innovation in the Korean electronics industry. This study also examines the moderating effect of organizational dynamism.
Design/methodology/approach
A unique theoretical model shows how inter-OL promotes organizational innovation through intra-OL, knowledge flows and stocks. Data was collected from 201 SMEs in the Korean electronics industry and analyzed by structural equation modeling.
Findings
The findings show that inter-OL directly and indirectly influences innovation. Inter-OL promotes both knowledge flows and stocks, but the only feedforward flows influence innovation through knowledge stocks while feedback flows directly influence innovation. Additionally, the study finds an indirect effect of inter-OL on knowledge stocks and a strong direct effect on innovation when dynamism is high. Intra-OL activities fully mediate between inter-OL and innovation when dynamism is low.
Research limitations/implications
This study uses single informants to measure all constructs. Future studies should use multiple informants.
Practical implications
This study shows that OL in SMEs is shaped by internal processes and external collaborations. Maintaining a connection with various external knowledge sources and creating collaborative opportunities to share learning experiences is critical to innovation.
Originality/value
This study is the first to empirically examine the relationship between inter- and intra-OL activities within a conceptual framework. The study provides a strategic view of how to facilitate OL activities considering the degree of organizational dynamism.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management
Reference91 articles.
1. Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory;Journal of Innovation & Knowledge,2020
2. Organizational learning research: past, present and future;Management Learning,2011
3. Double loop learning in organizations;Harvard Business Review,1977
4. Representation of measurement error in marketing variables: review of approaches and extension to three-facet designs;Journal of Econometrics,1998
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献