Towards a knowledge-based approach for effective decision-making in railway safety

Author:

Garcia-Perez Alexeis,Shaikh Siraj A,Kalutarage Harsha K.,Jahantab Mahsa

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to contribute towards understanding how safety knowledge can be elicited from railway experts for the purposes of supporting effective decision-making. Design/methodology/approach – A consortium of safety experts from across the British railway industry is formed. Collaborative modelling of the knowledge domain is used as an approach to the elicitation of safety knowledge from experts. From this, a series of knowledge models is derived to inform decision-making. This is achieved by using Bayesian networks as a knowledge modelling scheme, underpinning a Safety Prognosis tool to serve meaningful prognostics information and visualise such information to predict safety violations. Findings – Collaborative modelling of safety-critical knowledge is a valid approach to knowledge elicitation and its sharing across the railway industry. This approach overcomes some of the key limitations of existing approaches to knowledge elicitation. Such models become an effective tool for prediction of safety cases by using railway data. This is demonstrated using passenger–train interaction safety data. Practical implications – This study contributes to practice in two main directions: by documenting an effective approach to knowledge elicitation and knowledge sharing, while also helping the transport industry to understand safety. Social implications – By supporting the railway industry in their efforts to understand safety, this research has the potential to benefit railway passengers, staff and communities in general, which is a priority for the transport sector. Originality/value – This research applies a knowledge elicitation approach to understanding safety based on collaborative modelling, which is a novel approach in the context of transport.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference36 articles.

1. Bohnenblust, H. (1998), “Risk-based decision making in the transportation sector”, Jorissen, R.E. and Stallen, P.J.M. (Eds), Quantified Societal Risk and Policy Making , Springer, New York, Vol. 12, pp. 132-153.

2. Carpenter, S. (2011), “Passenger risk at the platform-train interface”, available at: www.rssb.co.uk/Library/risk-analysis-and-safety-reporting/2011-report-passenger-risk-at-the-platform-train-interface.pdf (accessed August 2014).

3. Carretero, J. Pérez, J.M. , Garcı′a-Carballeira, F. , Calderón, A. , Fernández, J. , Garcı′a, J.D. , Lozano, A. , Cardona, L. , Cotaina, N. and Prete, P. (2003), “Applying RCM in large scale systems: a case study with railway networks”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety , Vol. 82 No. 3, pp. 257-273.

4. Chen, Y. , Chen, S. , Sum, H. and Lin, S.C. (2003), “Functional requirements of metadata systems: from user needs perspective”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice-Metadata Research and Applications, Seattle, WA.

5. Cooke, N.J. (1999), “Knowledge elicitation”, Handbook of Applied Cognition , pp. 479-510.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3