The impact of US biofuel policies on agricultural price levels and volatility

Author:

Babcock Bruce A.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the market impacts of US biofuels and biofuel policies.Design/methodology/approachTwo methods of analysis are employed. The first method looks back in time and estimates what US crop prices would have been during the 2005 to 2009 marketing years under two scenarios. The second method of analysis is forward looking and examines the market impacts of the blender tax credit and mandate on the distribution of prices in the 2011 calendar and marketing year.FindingsThe results developed in the previous two sections show that US ethanol policies modestly increased maize prices from 2006 to 2009 and that market impacts of the policies will be larger under tighter market conditions.Practical implicationsMore flexible US biofuel policy including removing the blenders tax credit, which does not help US biofuel industry as long as the mandates are in place, and relaxing blending mandates when feedstock supplies are low.Originality/valueThis report makes three contributions to understanding the extent to which US biofuel policies contribute to higher agricultural and food prices. First, estimates of the impact of US ethanol policies on crop and food prices reveal that the impacts of the subsidies were quite modest. The second contribution is to provide estimates of the impact on agricultural commodity prices and food prices from market‐driven expansion of ethanol. The final contribution of this report is improved insight into how current US biofuel policies are expected to affect crop prices in the near future.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference5 articles.

1. Babcock, B.A., Barr, K. and Carriquiry, M. (2010), “Costs and benefits to taxpayers, consumers, and producers from US ethanol policies”, Staff Report 10‐SR‐106, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

2. FAPRI (2009), “Impacts of selected US ethanol policy options”, FAPRI‐MU Report No. 04‐09, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.

3. Salvo, A. and Huse, C. (2011), “Consumer choice between gasoline and sugarcane ethanol”, working paper, Northwestern University and Stockholm School of Economics, February.

4. Eidman, V. (2007), “Ethanol economics of dry mill plants”, Corn‐based Ethanol in Illinois and the US: A Report from the Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Chapter 3, available at: www.farmdoc.illinois.edu.

5. Gardner, B. (2007), “Fuel ethanol subsidies and farm price support”, Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, Vol. 5 No. 2 (article 4 ).

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3