The effects of different types of trust on consumer perceptions of food safety

Author:

Chen Weiping

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this research is to empirically investigate how different types of trust relate to consumer perceptions of food safety.Design/methodology/approachAfter a review of trust literature this study classifies trust into three distinct types: supplier‐level specific trust, industry‐level specific trust and general trust. The direct and indirect relationships between three types of trust and consumer perceptions of food safety were studied through a survey of 1165 consumers from Beijing municipality, China using structural equation model as an analytical tool.FindingsThe results indicate that trust in manufacturers and trust in retailers are directly positively related to food safety perceptions. Trust in farmers is not directly related to food safety perceptions. Industry‐level specific trust is not related to food safety perceptions directly, but it is positively related to supplier‐level specific trust, which in turn is positively related to food safety perceptions. Finally, general trust has only a weak indirect positive effect through its effect on trust in food manufacturers.Practical implicationsThe results imply that consumer perceived safety of food products might be enhanced by improving consumer trust in manufacturers and trust in retailers. The results also suggest that food suppliers are more difficult to build consumer trust when industry‐level specific trust is low and declining. In addition, food suppliers also get potential benefits through influencing and improving industry‐level specific trust. At last, the results suggest that some concerns about food safety are related to individuals' world reviews and maybe beyond the control of the food system.Originality/valueThis study is the first to investigate the relationship between different types of specific trust in the context of food safety. Accordingly, it complements existing trust models and helps predict and explain how trust relates to food safety perceptions directly and indirectly through interactions between different types of trust.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference94 articles.

1. Allum, N. (2007), “An empirical test of competing theories of hazard‐related trust: the case of GM food”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 935‐46.

2. Atuahene‐Gima, K. and Li, H.Y. (2002), “When does trust matter? Antecedents and contingent effects of supervisee trust on performance in selling new products in China and the United States”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66 No. 3, pp. 61‐81.

3. Baron, J., Hershey, J.C. and Kunreuther, H. (2000), “Determinants of priority for risk reduction: the role of worry”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 413‐27.

4. Bearden, W.O., Netemeyer, R.G. and Mobley, M.F. (1993), Handbook of Marketing Scales: Multi‐item Measures for Marketing and Consumer Behavior Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

5. Brehm, J. and Rahn, W. (1997), “Individual‐level evidence for the cause and consequences of social capital”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 999‐1023.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3