Abstract
PurposeThe paper is devoted to modeling a pricing policy of competitive firms in a “closed” economy framework.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed model can be regarded as an analog to CGE model and is based on the intersectoral balance methodology incorporating linear demand functions for goods and services.FindingsBy performing different model experiments, we show that a certain degree of competition can bring more profit to all competing firms, than in case of complete absence of such competition, what is also supported by empirical investigation. This finding implies that monopolies may perform worse than competitive firms, what contradicts with the modern provisions of economic theory, stating that monopoly is the most lucrative type of market structure for a producer. The discovered effect occurs due to the aggressive pricing policy, adopted by monopolies, spurring up the inflation spiral, which is most obvious if monopolies are strongly interdependent in terms of production matrix. This inflation spiral drives prices too high, what negatively reflects on firms’ costs and, consequently, results in monopolies receiving less profit.Originality/valueThe proposed model can also be useful for understanding and assessing various economic consequences after different external or internal shocks, what is especially crucial when conducting monetary or fiscal policy.
Reference31 articles.
1. Food security implications for low-and middle-income countries under agricultural input reduction: the case of the European Union's farm to fork and biodiversity strategies;Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy,2022
2. Dynamic price competition;Journal of Economic Theory,2006
3. Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: general- equilibrium analysess;The American Economic Review,1996
4. Competitive vices;Marketing Science eJournal,2011