E‐business models and consumer expectations for digital audio distribution

Author:

Amberg Michael,Schröder Manuela

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to aim to evaluate to what extent present e‐business models for digital audio distribution meet the consumer's expectations.Design/methodology/approachThe research method in this paper is particularly based on two empirical studies. In the first study, the supplier side was examined. In this context, 15 e‐business models in the German music market were identified, classified according to two criteria (type of compensation and dependency on the supplier or its technology) and analysed with regard to four aspects “type and volume of content”, “price of content”, “rights of use”, and “additional services”. To evaluate the identified e‐business models, the consumer expectations for digital audio distribution were analysed in a second study. Finally, the results of both studies were compared.FindingsThe paper finds that most of the identified e‐business models do not meet all of the fundamental consumer expectations. Either the identified category of e‐business models and its characteristics (e.g. dependency on technology) lead to a conflict with regard to the expectations of the consumers, or the implemented e‐business models reveal discrepancies between the concrete offer and the demand.Research limitations/implicationsThe results in the paper are limited to e‐business models for digital audio distribution in the German music market.Practical implicationsThe paper shows that, in order to reach more consumers, most of the existing e‐business models have to be modified.Originality/valueBased on two empirical studies, this paper presents the state‐of‐the‐art of the digital audio distribution in Germany and systematically identifies gaps between the demand and the supply side of digital audio content.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Information Systems,Management of Technology and Innovation,General Decision Sciences

Reference21 articles.

1. Becker, E., Buhse, W., Günnewig, D. and Rump, N. (2003), Digital Rights Management: Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects, Springer, Berlin.

2. Buhse, W. (2004), Wettbewerbsstrategien im Umfeld von Darknet und Digital Rights Management: Szenarien und Erlösmodelle für Onlinemusik, Deutscher Universitäts‐Verlag, Wiesbaden.

3. Buxmann, P., Pohl, G., Johnscher, P., Strube, J. and Groffmann, H.‐D. (2005), “Strategies for digital music markets: pricing and the effectiveness of measures against pirate copies – results of an empirical study”, Zukunftsmusik.net, July, available at: www.zukunftsmusik.net/paper_zm/strategies‐digital_music.pdf.

4. Dolan, R.J. and Simon, H. (1996), Power Pricing: How Managing Price Transforms the Bottom Line, The Free Press, New York, NY.

5. Duft, N., Stiehler, A., Vogeley, D. and Wichmann, T. (2005), “Digital music usage and DRM: results from a European Consumer Survey”, INDICARE, July, available at: www.indicare.org/tiki‐page.php?pageName=Downloads.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Changing Business Models in the Creative Industries: The cases of Television, Computer Games and Music;SSRN Electronic Journal;2024

2. Towards semantic operationalisation of the business model: a step forward;Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management;2023-07-28

3. Sustainability of Online News Media in Nepal;Global Perspectives on Journalism in Nepal;2022-02-23

4. Business Models for Data;Business Information Systems;2022

5. Digitization of Music: Consumer Adoption Amidst Piracy, Unbundling, and Rebundling;MIS Quarterly;2019-01-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3