Exploring office investment decision‐making in different European contexts

Author:

Roberts Claire,Henneberry John

Abstract

PurposeStudies of UK and US property investment markets have historically portrayed the decision‐making process as an exercise in rational analysis. This notion is fundamentally flawed as the concept of a perfect market has limited applicability to the real world context in which property investment decisions are taken. Investment decision‐making is neither clinical nor methodical but is undertaken by imperfect players in imperfect markets using imperfect information. The purpose of this paper is to explore the decision making processes of investors.Design/methodology/approachA normative‐behavioural framework incorporating heuristics is used, a technique whose application in property research has previously been limited to valuation. The empirical vehicle for the research was an exploration of the spatial dimension of office property investment in different European contexts.FindingsThe findings of in‐depth case studies of investment decision‐making in France, Germany and the UK indicate that the decision‐making process, as perceived by institutional investors, does not deviate significantly from normative models. However, investors tend to “collapse down” the decision‐making process, taking shortcuts to achieve (in some cases, predefined) investment outcomes. These short‐cuts potentially leave the decision‐making process open to the influence of bias, judgement and sentiment.Originality/valueThis study represents the first attempt to explore, empirically and in detail, the property investment decision‐making process.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference61 articles.

1. Adair, A., Berry, J. and McGreal, W. (1994), “Investment decision making: a behavioural perspective”, Journal of Property Finance, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 32‐42.

2. Ashton, A. and Ashton, R. (1988), “Sequential belief revision in auditing”, The Accounting Review, Vol. LXIII No. 4, pp. 623‐41.

3. Assere, S. (1992), “The auditors going concern decision: interaction of task variables and the sequential processing of evidence”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 87, p. 2.

4. Baker, M. (1998), “Fund managers' attitudes to risk and time horizons: the effect of performance benchmarking”, European Journal of Finance, Vol. 4, pp. 257‐78.

5. Ball, M. (1998), “Institutions in British property research”, Urban Studies, Vol. 35 No. 9, pp. 1501‐17.

Cited by 48 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3