Hybrid organizations: concept and measurement

Author:

Schmitz Björn,Glänzel Gunnar

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to find a new conception of hybridity to set ground for further systematic research. The concept of hybrid organisations is used in many ways. This leads to confusion among scholars and the term of hybridity appears to be meaningless and useless for research and practice. Design/methodology/approach – In this explorative research design, the authors conducted 11 interviews with managing directors and managers of hybrid organisations in four different countries across Europe. Findings – Each and every organisation is hybrid but to different degrees and with different patterns. It is important to measure hybridity to give value to the term of hybrid organisations. According to input, process and output dimensions, the authors could classify possible dimensions of hybridity measurement within organisations. Research limitations/implications – The developed cube model serves as a new point of departure for hybrid organisation research and helps to build analytical types of hybrid organisations. The research has been highly explorative, and the limited number of cases researched leads to the requirement of further validation on a broader basis. In addition, the still rather conceptual state of the cube model will need further validation by means of a set of hybridity indicators. Originality/value – The paper presents a way to deal with the question about what hybridity exactly is and whether hybridity is a term that has an analytical value. It also provides the first attempt to connect more analytical meaning to the concept of hybridity by suggesting an approach to concretely measure it.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management

Reference63 articles.

1. Alter, K. (2004), “Social enterprise typology”, available at: www.virtueventures.com/resources/setypology (accessed 10 February 2016).

2. Anheier, H.K. (2005), Nonprofit Organisations: Management, Theory, Policy , Routledge, London.

3. Anheier, H.K. and Then, V. (2004), Zwischen Eigennutz und Gemeinwohl. Neue Formen und Wege der Gemeinnützigkeit , Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh.

4. Battilana, J. and Dorado, S. (2010), “Building sustainable hybrid organisations: the case of commercial microfinance organisations”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 53 No. 6, pp. 1419-1440.

5. Battilana, J. , Lee, M. , Walker, J. and Dorsey, C. (2012), “In search of the hybrid ideal”, Stanford Social Innovation Review , Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 51-55.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3