Research and evidence-based standards paving the way for a digital and sustainable transformation of the built environment

Author:

Klungseth Nora Johanne,Nielsen Susanne Balslev,Alves da Graça Moacyr Eduardo,Lavy Sarel

Abstract

Purpose Researchers and standardisation bodies are key to accelerating societal transition and contributing to society’s demands for sustainability, resilience and digitalisation. Standards are the agreed-upon best practices published by national or international bodies and are key enablers of transformation. Scholars have not yet identified a relationship between standards and facilities management (FM) research. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of formal standards in FM research. Design/methodology/approach A literature review was conducted to identify journal articles addressing standards and FM. A total of 198 journal articles published from 2010 to 2021 were identified. After screening these articles, 27 journal articles were considered the most relevant for data analysis. Findings The findings show that the role of standards in research can be analysed thematically, categorically, textually, methodologically and directionally. Standards are relevant to research by defining terms, creating backgrounds, guiding research, supporting the development of new standards and encouraging more collaboration between research and standardisation. Some studies have shown how standards influence research, but only a few have explored how research influences standards. Research limitations/implications This research provides examples that inspire stronger collaboration between people and processes in research and standardisation. Originality/value The articles collected and analysed in this study comprise original research. A limited preliminary study of ten core articles was presented at the International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction World Congress 2022. This presentation of this work provides an expanded framework for analysing the roles of standards in research. This framework includes (1) categorical analysis of research and standardisation streams; (2) thematic analysis of the topic of interest; (3) textual analysis of the use of the term “standard”; (4) methodological analysis of the influence of standards on the research method; and (5) directional analysis of the intended audience.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference59 articles.

1. Does it pay to deliver superior ESG performance? Evidence form US S&P 500 companies;Journal of Global Responsibility,2022

2. BIM-based decision support for building condition assessment;Automation in Construction,2022

3. Enhancing occupants’ confot through BIM-based probabilistic approach;Automation in Construction,2021

4. A review of facilities management performance measurement;Property Management,2019

5. Occupational health and safety management and turnover intention in the Ghanaian mining sector;Safety and Health at Work,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3