Lean product engineering in the South African automotive industry
Author:
Mund Klaudia,Pieterse Koot,Cameron Sheila
Abstract
Purpose
– The puropse of this paper is to explore the extent to which principles of lean product development are applied to product design and engineering at automotive companies in South Africa (SA). Survey, interview and observational data form the basis for an adaptation of Toyota’s lean product development system (LPDS) (Morgan and Liker, 2006) to the South African automotive product engineering context.
Design/methodology/approach
– All seven automotive manufacturers then operating in SA (including Toyota) were investigated, together with sample of those suppliers carrying out product engineering and/or design locally. A questionnaire based on the LPDS, and follow-up interviews were used to ascertain the extent to which lean principles informed product engineering, and identify areas where there was scope for improvement.
Findings
– The survey established that while SA automotive companies have a strong manufacturing focus there is very limited local product design and development (PD&D), as this tends to be carried out centrally for multinationals. However, global product designs require modifications to suit local conditions and many decisions about manufacturability are taken locally. This broad area of design-related activity will be termed product engineering. The study found considerable scope for increasing the extent to which aspects of product engineering were influenced by lean thinking. An adapted version of the LPDS is proposed to aid lean thinking in product engineering in this context.
Originality/value
– This study provides information on the application of lean thinking in product engineering, an area that has attracted far less attention than manufacturing and PD&D. Furthermore it addresses a significant sector of an important emerging economy, and contributes a practitioner perspective to what is predominantly a theoretical literature.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Computer Science Applications,Control and Systems Engineering,Software
Reference58 articles.
1. Adler, P.S.
,
Mandelbaum, A.
,
Nguyen, V.
and
Schwerer, E.
(1996), “Getting the most out of your product development process”,
Harvard Business Review
, Vol. 74 No. 2, pp. 134-152. 2. Ainscough, M.
,
Neailey, K.
and
Tennant, Ch.
(2003), “A self-assessment tool for implementing concurrent engineering through change management”,
International Journal of Project Management
, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 425-431. 3. Al-Ashaab, A.
,
Golob, M.
,
Attia, U.M.
,
Khan, M.
,
Parsons, J.
,
Andino, A.
,
Perez, A.
,
Guzman, P.
,
Onecha, A.
,
Kesavamoorthy, S.
,
Martinez, G.
,
Shehab, E.
,
Berkes, A.
,
Haque, B.
,
Soril, M.
and
Sopelana, A.
(2013a), “The transformation of product development process into lean environment using set-based concurrent engineering: a case study from an aerospace industry”,
Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications
, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 268-285. 4. Al-Ashaab, A.
,
Petritsch, Ch.
,
Gourdin, M.
,
Urrutia, U.A.
,
Andino, A.
,
Varro, B.
,
Rigatti, C.
,
Golob, M.
,
Summers, M.
,
El-Nounu, A.
and
Kayani, A.
(2013b), “Lean product development performance measurement tool”, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Manufacturing Research, Cranfield University, Bedford, 19-20 September. 5. Ballé, F.
and
Ballé, M.
(2005), “Lean development”,
Business Strategy Review
, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 18-22.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|