Distributed expertise and instructions

Author:

Valsecchi Irene

Abstract

Purpose – The idea of Simon according to which instructions are premises for further decisions is formalized with respect to informationally decentralized organizations. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is built on the economic theory of teams by Marschak and Radner. Team theory is particularly suited to the analysis of informationally decentralized systems. Teams are composed of agents who strive for a common aim, but are informed of different parameters that characterize the state of nature. In particular, the members want to maximize the team payoff function that depends on both the actions of the members and the state of nature. Findings – For teams à la Marshack-Radner, since every member needs to compute optimal action rules, the paper shows that two types of expertise are required: forecasting expertise (as competence over the randomness of the parameters that affect the team payoff function) and organizational expertise (as comprehension of the relevant characteristics of the other members). When the members are supposed to have complete expertise, the only role of orders is the communication of information about the state of nature. Instead, when instructions report actions under the control of the senders, the team population can be classified into ranks, each one having a particular computational problem to solve. The paper analyzes the conditions under which instructions can correspond to different and ordered degree of intelligibility of the team operations. Through instructions non-decodable information is built directly into the decision rules chosen by the receivers, and instructions can realize economies in the use of expertise. Originality/value – Instructions are formally shown to play a crucial role when expertise is differently distributed across agents.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management

Reference35 articles.

1. Alchian, A. and Demsetz, H. (1972), “Production, information costs and economic organization”, American Economic Review, Vol. 62, pp. 777-795.

2. Arrow, K.J. (1974), The Limits of Organization, Norton, New York, NY.

3. Aumann, R.J. (2005), “Musing on information and knowledge”, Economic Journal Watch, Vol. 1, pp. 88-96.

4. Aumann, R.J. (2009), “Game engineering”, Discussion Paper Series No. dp518, Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem.

5. Aumann, R.J. and Brandenburger, A. (1995), “Epistemic conditions for Nash equilibrium”, Econometrica, Vol. 63, pp. 1161-1180.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3