Author:
Amjad Tehmina,Daud Ali,Aljohani Naif Radi
Abstract
Purpose
This study reviews the methods found in the literature for the ranking of authors, identifies the pros and cons of these methods, discusses and compares these methods. The purpose of this paper is to study is to find the challenges and future directions of ranking of academic objects, especially authors, for future researchers.
Design/methodology/approach
This study reviews the methods found in the literature for the ranking of authors, classifies them into subcategories by studying and analyzing their way of achieving the objectives, discusses and compares them. The data sets used in the literature and the evaluation measures applicable in the domain are also presented.
Findings
The survey identifies the challenges involved in the field of ranking of authors and future directions.
Originality/value
To the best of the knowledge, this is the first survey that studies the author ranking problem in detail and classifies them according to their key functionalities, features and way of achieving the objective according to the requirement of the problem.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference86 articles.
1. Indexing of authors according to their domain of expertise;Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science,2017
2. Author productivity indexing via topic sensitive weighted citations;Science International,2016
3. Impact of mutual influence while ranking authors in a co-authorship network;Kuwait Journal of Science,2016
4. MuICE: mutual influence and citation exclusivity author rank;Information Processing & Management,2015
5. Topic-based heterogeneous rank;Scientometrics,2015
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献