Vendor selection strategy for IT outsourcing: the weighted-criteria evaluation technique

Author:

Watjatrakul Boonlert

Abstract

Purpose – Most firms select their information technology outsourcing (ITO) vendors based on the two methods of the weighted-criteria evaluation technique – the “qualification score plus the lowest bid price for the highest price score (QS-LBHPS)” and the “qualification score plus the average bid price for the middle price score (QS-ABMPS).” This paper aims to understand whether these two methods provide the same or different results of vendor selection and how the proportional weights of a vendor's qualification and bid price affect the vendor selection results under the two methods. Design/methodology/approach –In total, 1,000 experimental tests were carried out using the developed spreadsheet template to examine vendor selection results of the two methods (QS-LBHPS and QS-ABMPS) and compare the vendor selection results under three conditions of vendors’ qualification and price weights. A correspondence analysis was also used to determine the proximal relationships among the selection results of the weighted criteria technique under the comparable methods. Findings – The results indicate that, when using the two methods of the weighted criteria technique for a vendor selection, the selection results are significantly correspondent. In addition, the proportions of qualification and price weights affect the selection results under the two methods. The different proportions of qualification and price weights under the two methods yield the same selection results rather than different results. Originality/value – This study fills the gap in ITO literatures concerning the vendor selection strategy. No empirical studies have been undertaken to compare the results of vendor selection under the two methods of the weighted-criteria evaluation technique. The findings enable a firm's selection team to apply the weighted-criteria evaluation technique effectively and realize that vendor selection results are altered based on the predefined proportions of qualification and price weights.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Information Systems,Management of Technology and Innovation,General Decision Sciences

Reference31 articles.

1. Agha, M. , Kermani, M.A. , Navidi, H. and Alborzi, F. (2012), “A novel method for supplier selection by two competitors, including multiple criteria”, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 527-535.

2. Ali-Karam, T. (2005), “Design/build selection process-art or science?”, Cost Engineering, Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 14-19.

3. Alsudairi, M. and Dwivedi, Y.K. (2010), “A multi-disciplinary profile of IS/IT outsourcing research”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 215-258.

4. APUC (2009), “Tender evaluation template”, available at: www.apuc-scot.ac.uk (accessed October 21, 2011).

5. Cross, J. (1995), “IT outsourcing: British petroleum”, Harvard Business Review, May-June pp. 94-102.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3