Abstract
Purpose
– This paper argues that international business (IB) theory needs to adapt to the changes that have occurred in the global economy when the world was divided into rich market economies, communist countries and poor economies. Changes in ideologies and technologies has opened up opportunities for emerging market multinational enterprises and the paper offers guidelines for a dynamic IB contingency theory to acknowledge these changes and learning.
Design/methodology/approach
– This is a conceptual paper which is designed to offer an alternative contingency perspective on IB theory.
Findings
– IB scholars should recognize the influence of several contingent variables such as the institutional environment, political systems, government-business-NGO relations, social norms-ethical behavior, country size and industry. The structural characteristics of an industry, their importance to the country and the regulatory regime are major variables in understanding how and whether firms can become emerging multinational enterprises (EMNEs). The paper finds that emerging market government and enterprises have strategies for building knowledge intensive industries through mergers and acquisitions and exploit these on a global scale.
Research limitations/implications
– IB scholars should recognize that multinational enterprises learn and they adapt to the global environment. Scholars should develop strategies or a way of thinking which is different to the status quo to take advantage of the new and changing circumstances where the rules of the game are different to those in the researcher's home country.
Practical implications
– The removal of trade barriers and government restrictions on trade and technological developments means that EMNEs and governments should not rely on protection and subsidies but should compete on being unique and adopt differentiated strategies in niche but global marketplaces.
Reference19 articles.
1. Aharoni, Y.
(1993), “In search of the unique: can firm-specific advantages be evaluated?”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 31-49.
2. Aharoni, Y.
(1999), “Internationalization of professional services: implications for accounting firms”, in
Brock, D.
,
Powell, M.
and
Hinings, C.R.
(Bob) (Eds), Restructuring the Professional Organization, Routledge, London, pp. 20-40.
3. Boston Consulting Group
(2013), Allies and Adversaries 2013 BCG Global Challengers, The Boston Consulting Group, Boston, MA, available at: www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/globalization_growth_introducing_the_2013_bcg_global_challengers/ (accessed February 21, 2014).
4. Bruche, G.
(2009), “The emergence of China and India as new competitors in MNCs’ innovation”, Competition & Change, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 267-288.
5. Buckley, P.J.
and
Casson, M.C.
(2009), “The internalization theory of the multinational enterprise: a review of the progress of a research agenda after 30 years”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 40, pp. 1563-1580.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献