Modeling the impact of distance between offices and borrowers on agricultural loan volume
Author:
Witte Taylor,DeVuyst Eric A,Whitacre Brian,Jones Rodney
Abstract
Purpose
– Farm Credit is a major provider of credit to agricultural producers in Oklahoma and nationally. The decision to place a new Farm Credit office reduces borrower search and travel costs and should increase loan volume. The purpose of this paper is to model the new loan volume as function of distance from east central Oklahoma county centroids to Farm Credit offices. The model is then used to predict the impact of placing new offices in underserved areas.
Design/methodology/approach
– County aggregate new loan volume is regressed on distances to Farm Credit branch and field offices and other variables expected to impact agricultural loan volume. The estimated model is used to predict new loan volume impact of adding additional branch and field offices in counties that did not have these offices. Confidence intervals are used to measure the significance of predicted loan volumes.
Findings
– Distances from county centroids to both branch and field offices were found to significantly reduce new loan volume. The results were used to simulate the addition of new branch and field offices. The simulation predicted the added annual new loan volume associated with office additions.
Practical implications
– Using spatial models, Farm Credit of east central Oklahoma and other agricultural lenders can better plan for expansion (or consolidation). These models indicate counties where annual new loan volume will likely be higher (or lower for consolidation) than other nearby counties. The result can be improved borrower access and system financial performance.
Originality/value
– While spatial modeling has been utilized in other sectors, little has been done relative to agricultural credit access and impact on loan volume. The model here explicitly models the impact that distance to Farm Credit offices have on annual new loan volume.
Subject
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference28 articles.
1. Ahrendsen, B.L.
,
Dixon, B.L.
and
Priyanti, A.
(1994), “Growth in agricultural loan market share for Arkansas commercial banks”,
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics
, Vol. 26 No. 2, p. 430. 2. Akhavein, J.
,
Goldberg, L.
and
White, L.
(2004), “Small banks, small business, and relationships: an empirical study of lending to small farms”,
Journal of Financial Services Research
, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 245-261. 3. Bard, S.K.
,
Barry, P.J.
and
Ellinger, P.N.
(2000), “Effects of commercial bank structure and other characteristics on agricultural lending”,
Agricultural Finance Review
, Vol. 60 No. 1, pp. 17-31. 4. Brewer, B.E.
,
Wilson, C.A.
,
Featherstone, A.M.
and
Langemeier, M.R.
(2014), “Multiple vs single lending relationships in the agricultural sector”,
Agricultural Finance Review
, Vol. 74 No. 1, pp. 55-68. 5. Briggeman, B.C.
,
Towe, C.A.
and
Morehart, M.J.
(2009), “Credit constraints: their existence, determinants, and implications for US farm and nonfarm sole proprietorships”,
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
, Vol. 91 No. 1, pp. 275-289.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|