Author:
Lalonde Carole,Gilbert Marie-Hélène
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine how rhetoric of cooperation is expressed and constructed during rituals of consultation and how this rhetoric is integrated into the consultant’s dramaturgical awareness that incorporates both impression management and the expression of self.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper uses a discursive approach and semi-structured interviews with directors and consultants working in the healthcare sector, a sector that routinely employs consultants to accompany directors in organizational change management. Rhetoric is constructed around four narrative lines that also constitute the four ritualized phases of the consulting process.
Findings
– The mantra of “respect rituals of passage and avoid breaking frames” is an integral part of the consultant’s dramaturgical awareness throughout the process, so as not to infringe upon the order of the interaction established with the directors. Moreover, the development of cooperative relations with other members of the organization is based largely on a rather vast repertoire of action resources that the consultant will have to deploy to face four areas of uncertainty in the rites of interaction; namely, anticipation, interpretation, delegation and adherence. Furthermore, this cooperation is far from definitively acquired and must be reflected upon along the way to maintain control over the definition of the situation. This study expands upon the interrelations between the strategic actor and the reflective practitioner in a consultant’s dramaturgical awareness.
Practical implications
– Practical implications are highlighted using the notion of reflective contract (Schön, 1983) for managers as clients, the transcendental precepts of authenticity put forward by Coghland (2008) for consultants as practitioners, and progressive forms of critical theory performativity as suggested by Spicer et al. (2009) and Wickert and Schaefer (2015) for researchers.
Originality/value
– The concept underlying this study is dramaturgical awareness. It is a concept but sparingly explored in the literature, yet nonetheless present among advocates who promote organizational dramaturgy based on the work of Goffman. This concept is linked to Crozier and Friedberg’s theory of the strategic actor and Schön’s theory of the reflective practitioner.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference109 articles.
1. Alter, N.
(2009),
Donner et prendre: la coopération en entreprise
, Éditions La Découverte, Paris.
2. Alvesson, M.
and
Willmott, H.
(1992), “On the idea of emancipation in organization and management studies”,
Academy of Management Review
, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 432-464.
3. Alvesson, M.
and
Willmott, H.
(2002), “Identity regulation as organizational control: producing the appropriate individual”,
Journal of Management Studies
, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 619-644.
4. Barnard, C.
(1938),
The Functions of the Executive
, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
5. Bate, P.
(2000), “Changing the culture of a hospital: from hierarchy to networked community”,
Public Administration
, Vol. 78 No. 3, pp. 485-512.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献