Understanding users: from man-made typologies to computer-generated clusters

Author:

Gustav Johannsen Carl

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of this article is to identify the main approaches and discuss their perspectives, including their strengths and weaknesses in, especially, public library contexts. The purpose is also to present and discuss the results of a recent – 2014 – Danish library user segmentation project using computer-generated clusters. Compared to traditional marketing texts, this article also tries to identify users segments or images created by the library profession itself. Segmentation of users can help libraries in the process of understanding user similarities and differences. Segmentation can also form the basis for selecting segments as target users and for developing tailored services for specific target segments. Thus, several approaches and techniques have been tested in library contexts. Design/methodology/approach – Basically, the article is built upon a literature review concerning different approaches to user segmentation in, especially, public library context from approximately 1980 till now (May 2014). Findings – The article reveals that – at least – five different principal approaches to user segmentation have been applied by the library sector during the past 30-35 years. Characteristics, strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches are identified, discussed and evaluated. Practical implications – When making decisions on future library user surveys, it is certainly an advantage, concerning the ability to make qualified decision, to know what opportunities that are at hand for identifying important segments. Originality/value – Some of the approaches have been treated individually in the library literature; however, it is probably the first time that the professions own user images and metaphors are dealt with in a user segmentation context.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference35 articles.

1. Adcock, D. , Bradfield, R. , Halborg, A. and Ross, C. (1995), Marketing- Principles and Practice, 2nd ed., Pitman Publishing, London.

2. Bacher, J. , Wenzig, K. and Vogler, M. (2004), “SPSS twostep cluster – a first evaluation”, available at: www. statisticalinnovations. com/products/twostep.pdf (accessed 28 April 2014).

3. Boter, J. and Wedel, M. (2005), “User categorization of public library collections”, Library and Information Science Research, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 190-202.

4. Brigham, T.J. (2013), “Personas: stepping into the shoes of the library user”, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 443-450.

5. Bunch, A. (1982), Community Information Services – Their Origins, Scope and Development, Bingley, London.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3