Reflective thinking, ambiguity tolerance, and knowledge sharing: application of the motivation-opportunity-ability framework

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to apply the motivation–opportunity–ability (MOA) framework to investigate the relationships between ambiguity tolerance (AT), reflective thinking (RT) and performance in a complex task to predict knowledge-sharing intent.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, 190 subjects performed a complex scheduling task in which they were randomly assigned to either participate in RT or not.FindingsResults show that factors of the MOA framework positively predicted knowledge-sharing intent. In addition, RT significantly increased intention to share for individuals with low performance or with low AT.Research limitations/implicationsMore research is needed to determine relationships between complex task performance and knowledge sharing, and the role of learning strategies, particularly self-directed ones such as RT. Future studies may use a larger sample size for more complex analysis.Practical implicationsRT may be used to create a sustainable and low-cost method of increasing knowledge sharing in complex tasks, without which those with low AT or low performance may not have participated.Originality/valueThe study supports the importance of contextual influences and points to how organizations can use RT in addition to individual motivation and ability to encourage knowledge sharing.