Author:
Ahern Terence,Byrne P.J.,Leavy Brian
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to extend the learning boundaries of traditional project capability, which follows the linear planning paradigm, in order to include non-linear complex projects that cannot be completely specified and planned in advance, and so require continuous learning over their life cycles.
Design/methodology/approach
– Based on an earlier empirical investigation, where complex-project capability (CPC) is developed through dynamic organizational learning based on non-linear problem solving, the paper examines some of the conceptual and practical implications of this process insight. The focus here is on incomplete pre-given knowledge and emergent knowledge creation during CPC development.
Findings
– Using the three interrelated dimensions of project type, knowledge creation method, and organizational learning approach, the paper reinterprets Karl Popper’s linear problem solving model for learning in traditional projects by introducing the concept of knowledge entropy (disorder) for learning in non-linear complex projects. The latter follows a path from “order to disorder to order” rather than from “order to order” under traditional assumptions.
Research limitations/implications
– By identifying a common learning process at individual, group, and organizational levels, developing CPC can be viewed as a “learning organization”. This multi-level approach facilitates research into distributed organizing for emergent knowledge creation during CPC development.
Practical implications
– In contrast to traditional planned projects with up-front prior knowledge, complex projects are characterized by incomplete knowledge. The challenge of dealing with knowledge uncertainty in complex projects through continuous learning has practical implications for project learning, planning, knowledge management, and leadership.
Originality/value
– The concept of knowledge entropy (disorder) extends the learning boundaries of traditional projects, where little learning is anticipated, by including complex projects with knowledge uncertainty requiring continuous learning.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference119 articles.
1. Ahern, T.
(2013), “The development of project management capability in complex organisational settings: towards a knowledge-based view”, unpublished PhD thesis, Dublin City University Business School, Dublin.
2. Ahern, T.
,
Leavy, B.
and
Byrne, P.J.
(2014), “Knowledge formation and learning in the management of projects: a problem solving perspective”,
International Journal of Project Management
, Vol. 32 No. 8, pp. 1423-1431.
3. Ansoff, H.I.
(1991), “Critique of Henry Mintzberg’s ‘the design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management’”,
Strategic Management Journal
, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 449-461.
4. Argyris, C.
(1993),
Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change
, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
5. Ayas, K.
and
Zeniuk, N.
(2001), “Project-based learning: building communities of reflective practitioners”,
Management Learning
, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 61-76.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献