Author:
Daspit Josh,Justice Tillman C.,Boyd Nancy G.,Mckee Victoria
Abstract
PurposeCurrent research remains unclear on what factors contribute to cross‐functional team (CFT) success. Thus, the primary purpose of this investigation is to examine internal factors of the team (namely internal team environment, shared leadership, and cohesion) and the influence of each factor on CFT effectiveness.Design/methodology/approachStructural equation modeling is used to empirically examine the data collected from an undergraduate student sample. Teams worked competitively on a complex task requiring functional area expertise.FindingsResults from the study indicate internal team environment influences effectiveness through shared leadership and cohesion as found in other forms of teams. However, unique to CFTs, internal team environment is not directly related to effectiveness, and shared leadership does not directly influence cohesion. The findings suggest that in CFTs, internal team environment indirectly influences effectiveness.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this study can be used to expand current models of CFT effectiveness. Additionally, by examining the internal dynamics of the team (e.g. internal team environment) researchers will be better able to account for the previous vast differences found in CFT outcomes.Practical implicationsManagers interested in influencing team effectiveness are encouraged to focus on the internal dynamics of CFTs. To indirectly influence team effectiveness managers should insure teams establish a clear purpose and that members support one another and feel comfortable making contributions to the team.Originality/valueThis investigation offers understanding of how CFTs can be structured to influence effectiveness and provides insight into previously inconsistent findings. Both researchers and managers will benefit from an enhanced understanding of how internal factors uniquely influence CFT effectiveness.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Management Information Systems,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Reference97 articles.
1. Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J.E. and Rapp, A. (2005), “To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of empowering leader behaviors on customer satisfaction and performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90 No. 5, pp. 945‐55.
2. Akaike, H. (1973), “Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle”, in Kotz, S. and Johnson, N.L. (Eds), Breakthroughs in Statistics, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 559‐624.
3. Amason, A.C. (1996), “Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams”, Academy of Management, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 123‐48.
4. Ancona, D.G. and Caldwell, D.F. (1992), “Bridging the boundary: external activity and performance in organizational teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 634‐65.
5. Bagozzi, R.P. and Edwards, J.R. (1998), “A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research”, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 45‐87.
Cited by
74 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献