Author:
Sampath Kumar B.T.,Manoj Kumar K.S.
Abstract
PurposeThe main purpose of the present study is to examine the availability and persistence of URL citations in two LIS open access journals. It also intended to calculate the half‐life period of URL citations cited in journal articles.Design/methodology/approachA total of 2,890 URL citations cited in 689 research articles published in LIS journals spanning a period of 14 years (1996‐2009) were extracted. In order to check the accessibility of URL citations, W3C link checker was used. After the initial check, inactive URL citations were listed. Domains and HTTP errors associated with inactive URL citations were identified for further analysis. The half‐life period was calculated using the formula t(h)=[t ln(0.5)]/[ln W(t)−ln W(0)].FindingsThe research findings indicated that 57.61 percent (397 of 689) of articles have URL citations and percentage of URL citations increased from 5.98 percent in 1996 to 27.79 percent in 2009. It was found that 26.08 percent of all citations were not accessible during the time of testing and the majority of errors were due to HTTP 404 error code (not found). The domains.net and.gov were more stable compared to the domains.com/.co,.org, and.edu. The half‐life was computed to be approximately 11.5 years, which compares favorably against earlier research works.Originality/valueThis is a comprehensive study on the availability and persistence of URL citations cited in LIS journals articles spanning a period of 14 years. The findings of the study will be helpful to authors, publishers and editorial staff to improve existing URL citation conventions and to promote URL use to ensure that URL citations are accessible in future.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference39 articles.
1. Aronsky, D., Madani, S., Carnevale, R.J., Duda, S. and Feyder, M.T. (2007), “The prevalence and inaccessibility of internet references in the biomedical literature at the time of publication”, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 232‐4.
2. Bar‐Ilan, J. and Peritz, B.C. (2004), “Evaluation, continuity and disappearance of documents on a specific topic on the web: a longitudinal study of informetrics”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 55 No. 11, pp. 980‐90.
3. Bugeja, M. and Dimitrova, D.V. (2005), “Exploring the half‐life of internet footnotes”, Iowa Journal of Communication, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 77‐86.
4. Carnevale, R.J. and Aronsky, D. (2005), “The life and death of URLs in five biomedical informatics journals”, available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1560766/pdf/amia2005_0912.pdf (accessed June 20, 2011).
5. Casserly, M.F. and Bird, J.E. (2003), “Web citation availability: analysis and implications for scholarship”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 64 No. 7, pp. 300‐17.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献