Information literacy in the professional literature: an exploratory analysis

Author:

Aharony Noa

Abstract

PurposeThe current study aims to review the different publications dealing with information literacy and the emerging trends reflected over the ten years, 1999‐2009, in the Web of Science (WOS) database.Design/methodology/approachThe study presents both a statistical descriptive analysis of document type, subject areas, authors, source titles, publication years, languages, countries and keywords of publications extracted from the WOS database, as well as a thorough content analysis of keywords and abstracts extracted from the WOS database.FindingsThe main results suggest that the term information literacy has various characteristics in an additional and interesting context: health and medicine. This finding may reflect a tendency of association between information literacy and health and medicine and stresses people's need for information literacy in this specific context.Originality/valueThe current study emphasises the notion that information literacy is no longer an issue for librarians or educators only.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference48 articles.

1. Aharony, N. (2009), “Librarians and information scientists blogosphere: an exploratory analysis”, Library and Information Science Research, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 174‐81.

2. Aharony, N. and Bronstein, J. (2009), “Understanding tagging patterns: a comparison between the tagging behaviour of bloggers and of information specialists”, submitted for publication.

3. American Library Association (1989), “Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report”, available at: www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/whitepapers/presidential.htm (accessed 9 September 2009).

4. Bar‐Ilan, J. (2000), “The web as an information source on informetrics? A content analysis”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 51 No. 5, pp. 432‐43.

5. Bawden, D. (2001), “Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 218‐59.

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3