Abstract
PurposeWe review quantitative methods for analysing the equity impacts of health care and public health interventions: who benefits most and who bears the largest burdens (opportunity costs)? Mainstream health services research focuses on effectiveness and efficiency but decision makers also need information about equity.Design/methodology/approachWe review equity-informative methods of quantitative data analysis in three core areas of health services research: effectiveness analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis and performance measurement. An appendix includes further readings and resources.FindingsResearchers seeking to analyse health equity impacts now have a practical and flexible set of methods at their disposal which builds on the standard health services research toolkit. Some of the more advanced methods require specialised skills, but basic equity-informative methods can be used by any health services researcher with appropriate skills in the three core areas.Originality/valueWe hope that this review will raise awareness of equity-informative methods of health services research and facilitate their entry into the mainstream so that health policymakers are routinely presented with information about who gains and who loses from their decisions.
Subject
Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference29 articles.
1. Equity in health care financing in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of evidence from studies using benefit and financing incidence analyses;PloS One,2016
2. Distributional impact analysis: toolkit and illustrations of impacts beyond the average treatment effect;The World Bank,2017
3. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of low birthweight in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis;The Lancet Global Health,2019
4. Three simple rules to ensure reasonably credible subgroup analyses;British Medical Journal,2015
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献