Broadening the concept of patient safety culture through value-based healthcare

Author:

Dombrádi ViktorORCID,Bíró KláraORCID,Jonitz Guenther,Gray Muir,Jani AnantORCID

Abstract

PurposeDecision-makers are looking for innovative approaches to improve patient experience and outcomes with the finite resources available in healthcare. The concept of value-based healthcare has been proposed as one such approach. Since unsafe care hinders patient experience and contributes to waste, the purpose of this paper is to investigate how the value-based approach can help broaden the existing concept of patient safety culture and thus, improve patient safety and healthcare value.Design/methodology/approachIn the arguments, the authors use the triple value model which consists of personal, technical and allocative value. These three aspects together promote healthcare in which the experience of care is improved through the involvement of patients, while also considering the optimal utilisation and allocation of finite healthcare resources.FindingsWhile the idea that patient involvement should be integrated into patient safety culture has already been suggested, there is a lack of emphasis that economic considerations can play an important role as well. Patient safety should be perceived as an investment, thus, relevant questions need to be addressed such as how much resources should be invested into patient safety, how the finite resources should be allocated to maximise health benefits at a population level and how resources should be utilised to get the best cost-benefit ratio.Originality/valueThus far, both the importance of patient safety culture and value-based healthcare have been advocated; this paper emphasizes the need to consider these two approaches together.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference44 articles.

1. Falls and Fractures: a systematic approach to screening and prevention;Maturitas,2015

2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2013), “Health Policy Analysis 2013 - analysis of hospital-acquired diagnoses and their effect on case complexity and resource use - final report”, available at: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/Analysis-of-hospital-acquired-diagnoses-and-their-effect-on-case-complexity-and-resource-use-Dec-2013.pdf (accessed 8 July 2020).

3. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2014), “Health literacy: taking action to improve safety and quality”, available at: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Health-Literacy-Taking-action-to-improve-safety-and-quality.pdf (accessed 8 July 2020).

4. Systematic reviews and meta-analytic techniques;Seminars in Pediatric Surgery,2018

5. Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of surgical safety checklists: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence;BMJ Quality and Safety,2015

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3