Author:
Duppati Geeta,Scrimgeour Frank,Chancharat Surachai,Kijkasiwat Ploypailin
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to investigate how ethnic diversity and finance options impact the survival of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in New Zealand.
Design/methodology/approach
This study incorporates survey data and secondary data from the public domain. The surveys were conducted across six sectors of the economy categorised into four main ethnic groups involving six nationalities. This study adopts regression analysis using Probit, Logit and linear probability.
Findings
The financing choices of the entrepreneurs were consistent with pecking-order theory. The evidence suggests that information asymmetries are prevalent in New Zealand, as SMEs’ owners perceive significant risk from expanding businesses internationally. There is no relationship between ethnicity bias and the survival of firms.
Originality/value
This study provides a contribution to the literature on factors relating to business survival and guides the policymakers to use the benefits of potential factors to increase the survival rate of SMEs.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference29 articles.
1. How are SMEs financed? Evidence from the Ghanaian non-traditional export sector;Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy,2006
2. Introduction: entrepreneurship and economic development;Regional Studies,2004
3. Immigration, employment, and entrepreneurship;American Economic Review,2012
4. Commercial bank financing of white and black-owned small business startups;Quarterly Review of Economics and Business,1991
5. Do lenders discriminate against minority and woman entrepreneurs?;Journal of Urban Economics,2008
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献