Health for All and British health policy: a comment on the quest for “healthy public policy”

Author:

Milewa Timothy

Abstract

Explains that Health for All is an international extra‐governmental movement that seeks to pursue equity in access to health‐related resources by broadening the scope of health policy. Notes that its major principles include social participation in state decision making, inter‐sectoral collaboration in policy formulation and the improvement of conditions for the disadvantaged. Points out that its local initiatives often encompass health‐service professionals and practitioners as well as the voluntary sector, social services and other local authority departments, and that the effect of this local activity on political understandings of health at a national level gives some indication of the extent to which this local time and effort have been justified. In this respect, notes two limits to the impact of the Health for All movement on the political debates about health in Britain. Suggests that these centre on a largely indifferent but powerful national government and an emphasis within the movement initiatives at the level of a politically marginalized local state.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. 1.World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Targets for Health for All: the Health Policy for Europe (summary of the updated edition, September 1991), WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, 1992.

2. 2.McQueen, D.V., “Thoughts on the ideological origins of health promotion”, Health Promotion International, Vol. 4 No. 4, 1989, pp. 339‐42.

3. 3.Leeuw, E. de and Polman. L., “Health policy making: the Dutch experience”, Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 40 No.3, 1995, pp. 331‐8.

4. 4.Farrant, W., “Addressing the contradictions: health promotion and community health action in the United Kingdom”, International Journal of Health Services, Vol. 21 No. 3, 1991, pp. 423‐39.

5. 5.Milewa, T., “Local participation in health and social services planning: the limits to local empowerment in a case study of new participatorv structures in Medway/Swale”, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Kent at Canterbury, 1995.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. 8 – La prise en compte des inégalités sociales dans les politiques de santé durant l’ère conservatrice en Grande-Bretagne (1979-1997);Lutter contre les inégalités sociales de santé;2008-01-02

2. Logistics in the health care industry;International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management;1998-12-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3