Navigating the ethical maze through design action research

Author:

Tansley Carole,Kirk Susan,Fisher Colin

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to identify how ethical stances can be used to develop a frame set in the design of a web-based decision support system (DSS) for ethical decision-making and to test both the efficacy of these frames and the potential of such a tool for individuals and groups in both leadership development situations and organisational practice. Unethical behaviour by executives is a frequently cited reason for erosion of trust with other stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach – Utilising action research, by choosing ethics frames such as heuristics, a web-based ethics DSS designed to enable users to explore ethical issues from multiple perspectives was constructed and this was beta-tested with a major UK bank and a global oil company. Findings – In orchestrating constant revisions of the ethics frames in the tool, learning from each research cycle was identified, a new form of action research, a design action research, which emphasises the importance of collaboration in the design of such decision-making tools, was offered and the tool for management development and other applications was successfully beta-tested. Originality/value – It was demonstrated to management developers how web-based systems might be designed by non-information technology professionals; the framing literature was added by demonstrating the value of engaging in dialogue about ethical issues of concern to managers and their organisations and thus improving decision-making; and additions were made to the literature on ethics and Information systems (IS) and contribution toward action research in the fields of IS and ethics was done.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference93 articles.

1. Agor, W.H. (1986), The Logic of Intuitive Decision Making: A Research-Based Approach for Top Management, Quorum Books, New York, NY.

2. Agor, W.H. (1989) (Ed), Intuition in Organizations: Leading and Managing Productivity, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

3. Angeles, P.A. (1992), The HarperCollins Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd ed, HarperCollins, New York, NY.

4. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1991), “Participatory action research and action science”, in Whyte, and W.F. (Ed), Participatory Action Research, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 85-94.

5. Arjoon, S. (2008), “Reconciling situational social psychology with virtue ethics”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 221-243.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3