Integrated care communities: putting change theory into practice

Author:

Bradbury Elizabeth

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the experience of the Advancing Quality Alliance's (AQuA) regional Integrated Care Discovery Community created to translate integrated care theory into practice at scale and to test ways to address the system enablers of integrated care. Design/methodology/approach – Principles of flexibility, agility, credibility and scale influenced Community design. The theoretical framework drew on relevant complexity, learning community and change management theories. Co-designed with stakeholders, the discovery-based Community model incorporated emergent learning from change in complex adaptive environments and focused bespoke support on leadership capability building. Findings – In total, 19 health and social care economies participated. Kotter's eight-step change model proved flexible in conjunction with large-scale change theories. The tension between programme management, learning communities and the emergent nature of change in complex adaptive systems can be harnessed to inject pace and urgency. Mental models and simple rules were helpful in managing participant's desire for a directive approach in the context of a discovery programme. Research limitations/implications – This is a viewpoint from a regional improvement organisation in North West England. Social implications – The Discovery Community was a useful construct through which to rapidly develop multiple integrated health and social care economies. Flexible design and bespoke delivery is crucial in a complex adaptive environment. Capability building needs to be agile enough to meet the emergent needs of a changing workforce. Collaborative leadership has emerged as an area requiring particular attention. Originality/value – Learning from AQuA's approach may assist others in structuring large-scale integrated care or complex change initiatives.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)

Reference21 articles.

1. Applebaum, S. , Habashy, S. , Malo, J.L. and Shafiq, H. (2012), “Back to the future: revisiting Kotter's 1996 change model”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 31 No. 8, pp. 764-782.

2. Argyris, C. (1976), “Single-loop and double-loop models on research on decision making”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 363-375, available at: http://academic.udayton.edu/richardghere/igo%20ngo%20research/argyris.pdf (accessed 30 April 2013).

3. Bevan, H. , Plsek, P. and Winstanley, L. (2011), Leading Large Scale Change: A Practical Guide NHS Institute, NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, Warwick.

4. Dixon-Woods, M. , McNicol, S. and Martin, G. (2012), Overcoming Challenges to Improving Quality, The Health Foundation, available at: www.health.org.uk/public/cms/75/76/313/3357/overcoming%20challenges.pdf?realName=dpXpKe.pdf (accessed 30 April 2014).

5. Edgren, L. and Barnard, K. (2012), “Complex adaptive systems for management of integrated care”, Leadership in Health Services, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 39-51.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3