Integrated services for women through a One Stop Shop: a realist review

Author:

Hardwick Rebecca

Abstract

Purpose – One Stop Shops (OSSs) are a model of integrated delivery, where a range of needs are met in one place through a bespoke, person-centred service that works across organisational and sectoral boundaries. Third Sector Organisations provide OSSs for women in the criminal justice system and whilst they are shown to be effective in meeting complex needs, how this effectiveness is generated needs explaining. The purpose of this paper is to set out a preliminary framework for explaining their effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach – A realist review was conducted to research the way in which context influences how OSSs work. This approach was chosen because it is designed to synthesise evidence on social programmes and policies which are complex. The review was conducted in two phases: theory building and theory refinement. Findings – The review explains how individual, interpersonal, institutional and infrastructural contexts influence the effectiveness of OSSs. The evidence suggested that the organisational or legal form of the provider is not as important as the values and attitudes of their staff. Originality/value – The paper adds to our understanding of how OSS services work, and gives insight for commissioners and Third Sector providers of services by beginning to explain how this effectiveness is generated.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)

Reference26 articles.

1. Anderson, S. (2011), “A way through the woods: opening pathways to mental health care for women with multiple needs”, Advances in Dual Diagnosis, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 63-74.

2. Cabinet Office (2010), Building a Stronger Civil Society. A Strategy for Voluntary and Community Groups, Charities and Social Enterprises, HMSO, London.

3. Connell, J.P. , Kubisch, A.C. , Schorr, L.B. and Weiss, C.H. (1995), New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods and Contexts, Aspen Institute, Washington DC.

4. Covington, S.S. (1998), “Women in prison: approaches in the treatment of our most invisible population”, Women and Therapy, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 141-155.

5. Department of Health (2004), Making Partnerships Work for Patients, Carers and Service Users: a Strategic Agreement Between the Department of Health, the NHS and the Voluntary and Community Sector, HMSO, London.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3