Swedish healthcare management practices and quality improvement work: development trends

Author:

Elg Mattias,Stenberg Jesper,Kammerlind Peter,Tullberg Sofia,Olsson Jesper

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to empirically examine developmental trends in healthcare organisation management practice and improvement work.Design/methodology/approachPrimary healthcare centre (n=1,031) and clinical hospital department (n=1,542) managers were surveyed in spring 2007 (response rate 46 per cent). This article compares results from this survey with a study in 2003. A theoretical framework based on organisational inner context, organisational outer context, external environment and outcomes form the analytical base. Comparisons were made using independent two‐sample t‐tests.FindingsA general aspect, identified empirically, is the tendency toward increased external pressure on leaders in their improvement work. Higher management decisions, patient pressure and decisions made by policymakers increasingly influence and shape the choices made by healthcare managers about where to focus improvement efforts. Three different trends are empirically identified and elaborated: take‐control logic; practice‐based improvement; and patient‐centeredness.Research limitations/implicationsHealthcare leaders should carefully design new management control systems that support healthcare micro systems. Findings support the general assumption that staff increasingly tend to focus organisational changes on management control.Originality/valueThis study extends management research with a unique survey. Through two measurements made in 2003 and 2007, several important trends about how healthcare organisations are managed and developed are identified.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference28 articles.

1. Anell, A. (2005), “Swedish healthcare under pressure”, Health Economics, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 237‐54.

2. Banta, D.H. and Luce, B.R. (1993), Healthcare Technology and Its Assessments: An International Perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

3. Beer, M. and Nohria, M. (2000), Breaking the Code of Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

4. Bergman, B. and Klefsjö, B. (2003), Quality – From Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction, Studentlitteratur, Lund.

5. Bero, L., Grilli, R., Grimshaw, J.M., Harvey, E., Oxman, A.D. and Thomson, M.A. (1998), “Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings”, British Medical Journal, Vol. 317 No. 7156, pp. 465‐8.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3