Author:
Larsson Gerry,Wilde‐Larsson Bodil
Abstract
PurposeThe paper's purpose is to develop a care‐context adapted version of the emotional stress reaction questionnaire (ESRQ), which is based on the cognitive‐phenomenological writings of Lazarus, and, using this instrument, to explore the relationship between quality of care from a patient perspective and patient satisfaction while taking key antecedent conditions into account.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 624 patients at 16 Swedish out‐patient clinics (75 per cent response rate). Patients responded to the ERSQ, the quality from the patient's perspective questionnaire (QPP), the single‐item measures of personality (SIMP), and questions related to the outcome of the visit. Dimensionality of the ESRQ was analysed using exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modelling. The relationship between the theoretical concepts was explored with logistic regression analysis.FindingsA care‐context adapted version of the ESRQ was developed with meaningful factors and satisfactory psychometric properties. Care‐episode specific appraisal and coping processes covaried as predicted with emotional responses. The theoretical model was partly confirmed when assessed against two outcome criteria: intention to follow the doctor's advice and hesitation to visit the same out‐patient clinic again.Practical implicationsThe scales used are easy to administer and interpret.Originality/valueThe suggested theoretical model of the relationship between quality of care from a patient perspective and patient satisfaction is new, as is the emotion‐oriented approach to assessing patient satisfaction.
Subject
Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference43 articles.
1. Alden, D.L., Hoa, D.M. and Bwawuk, D. (2004), “Client satisfaction with reproductive health‐care: integrating business approaches to modelling and measurement”, Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 59 No. 11, pp. 2219‐32.
2. Aroian, K.I.F. and Norris, A.E. (2005), “Confirmatory factor analysis”, in Munro, B.H. (Ed.), Statistical Methods for Health Care Researchers, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 351‐75.
3. Bentler, P.M. and Dudgeon, P. (1996), “Covariance structure analysis: statistical practice, theory, and directions”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 563‐92.
4. Bowers, M.R. and Kiefe, C.I. (2002), “Measuring health care quality: comparing and contrasting the medical and the marketing approaches”, American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 136‐44.
5. Cohen, G., Forbes, J. and Garraway, M. (1996), “Can different patient satisfaction survey methods yield consistent results? Comparison of three surveys”, British Medical Journal, Vol. 313 No. 7061, pp. 841‐4.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献