A pilot study of satisfaction in oncology nursing care: an indirect predictor of quality of care

Author:

Uña Cidón Esther,Cuadrillero Martín Fernando,Hijas Villaizán Milagros,López Lara Francisco

Abstract

PurposeAlthough “satisfaction” is not easy to define, excellence in health care is impossible without professional/patient satisfaction, so this paper aims to report on a pilot study designed in order to evaluate the degree of nursing staff satisfaction with the implementation of measures to improve quality of care.Design/methodology/approachThe project consisted of several phases: writing protocols of care; training of nursing staff in their management; and a cross‐sectional study to evaluate nursing staff satisfaction with them. The design of the survey consisted of a 16‐item Likert scale, which had to be auto filled. A factorial analysis to simplify and validate the tools was used, using statistical analyses with SPSS software 8.0.Practical implicationsThe results are applicable to young small oncological units with high degree of variability in patient care. The study showed that nursing staff satisfaction with new improvement measures taken improves safety and finally quality of care.FindingsThe study obtained four dimensions (D) explaining 100 percent of variance. Each dimension with several items: D1: “Nursing job quality” explaining 48.4 percent of variance; D2: “Satisfaction with the knowledge”; D3: “Nursing job feelings/perceptions”; D4: “Nursing communication with doctors/patients”. It provided a direct point of view of each nurse, knowledge about problems encountered daily and demonstration of how a simple/convenient method is useful to engage the staff in decision‐making‐process and implementation of new strategies or to promote the integration of basic aspects of health management in daily clinical practice.Originality/valueThis is the first study evaluating nursing staff satisfaction with new improvement measures taken in a small medical unit, aiming at quality of care benefits. Very promising results were obtained although the sample size was small.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference30 articles.

1. Bergenmar, M., Nylen, U., Lidbrink, E., Bergh, J. and Brandberg, Y. (2006), “Improvements in patient satisfaction at an outpatient clinic for patients with breast cancer”, Acta Oncologica, Vol. 45 No. 5, pp. 550‐8.

2. Berné, C., Múgica, J.M. and Yagüe, M.J. (1996), “Strategic management and the concepts of perceived quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty”, Industrial Economics, No. 307, pp. 63‐74.

3. Bolus, R. and Pitts, J. (1999), “Patient satisfaction: the indispensable outcome”, Managed Care, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 24‐8.

4. Carr‐Hill, R.A. (1992), “The measurement of patient satisfaction”, Journal of Public Health Medicine, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 236‐49.

5. Cleary, P.D. (1999), “The increasing importance of patient surveys”, Quality in Health Care, Vol. 8 No. 4, p. 212.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3