Telephone and web‐based pediatric day surgery questionnaires

Author:

Amari Erica,Vandebeek Christine,Montgomery Carolyne J.,Skarsgard Erik,Ansermino J. Mark

Abstract

PurposePatient questionnaires are popular tools for assessing and improving service quality, especially as administrators are increasingly expected to consider the patient's voice in their decision making. Despite web‐based questionnaire advantages, they have not been previously compared to telephone questionnaires for assessing quality. The purpose of this paper is to compare telephone questionnaire administration with a web‐based version.Design/methodology/approachDay surgery patients from a tertiary pediatric hospital completed a telephone interview and a web‐based questionnaire with identical questions. The appropriateness of the web version as a telephone version substitute was ascertained by comparing the number of changes in responses, non‐responses, differences in means, the number of non‐substantive responses and reliability.FindingsThe web‐based questionnaire tended towards more negative responses. The mean number of missing responses did not differ between versions, although the web‐questionnaire had more “not sure” responses. Inter‐rater reliability was acceptable.Research limitations/implicationsParents without internet access were unable to participate.Practical implicationsThe web‐based questionnaire is a good substitute for telephone‐administered questionnaires.Originality/valueThe paper shows that parents were able to rate items more candidly owing to the increase in privacy and lack of interviewer bias, which is crucial for improving health service quality.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference32 articles.

1. 3.0 Internet Access and Profiles (2005), Canadian Interactive Reid Report, No. 4th Quartile, Winter, pp. 11‐16, available at: www.ipsos.ca/pdf/Ipsos_Q4InternetAccess Profiles.pdf (accessed May 23, 2007).

2. Amari, E., Murray, D.M., Vandebeek, C., Montgomery, C.J., Skarsgard, E., Warnock, F. and Ansermino, J.M. (2007), “Brief report: development of pediatric day surgery quality measurement questionnaire”, Journal of Healthcare Quality, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 36‐44.

3. Ayhan, H.O. and Isiksal, S. (2004), “Memory recall errors in retrospective studies: a reverse record check study”, Quality and Quantity, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 475‐93.

4. Best, S.J. and Krueger, B. (2000), “New approaches to assessing opinion: The prospects for electronic mail surveys”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Vol. 12, pp. 73‐92.

5. Blumberg, S.J. and Luke, J.V. (2006), Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates Based on Data from the National Health Interview Survey, Centre for Disease Control & Prevention, Atlanta, GA, July‐December, available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless200705.pdf (accessed May 23, 2007).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3