Asymmetric relationships in networked agricultural innovation processes

Author:

Lambrecht Evelien,Kühne Bianka,Gellynck Xavier

Abstract

Purpose – In innovation networks, asymmetric relationships are both considered as an opportunity and a threat for the enhancement of innovation. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how much asymmetry Flemish farmers perceive in their relationships for innovation with colleagues, suppliers and buyers. Design/methodology/approach – In total, 86 farmers active in four different agricultural subsectors in Flanders were consulted, of which 38 via in-depth interviews and 48 in seven focus groups. Data were analysed using NVivo. Findings – The authors found that across subsectors, different players in innovation networks play different roles. Furthermore, the authors observed that the majority of farmers see their relationships more as a necessity for the farm to be able to function, than as an opportunity for innovation. If they collaborate for innovation, they often prefer symmetric relationships with similar companies on horizontal level. Vertical collaboration for innovation is not very popular in the sample. Practical implications – The findings suggest that farmers should take more actions to gain power in the chain and improve their skills with regards to negotiating with their suppliers or buyers. Furthermore, the authors found which characteristics of asymmetric relationships would foster the development of innovation processes. Originality/value – Empirical work studying the effects and impacts of asymmetric relationships for innovation from the SME’s perspective are still limited, especially in the agricultural sector. Furthermore, this sector is of practical relevance to study because the need for networking and innovation is very real.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference68 articles.

1. Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation , Basic Books, Inc. Publishers, New York, NY.

2. Batterink, M. , Wubben, E. , Klerkx, L. and Omta, S. (2010), “Orchestrating innovation networks: the case of innovation brokers in the agri-food sector”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development , Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 47-76.

3. Blomqvist, K. (2002), “Partnering in the dynamic environment: the role of trust in asymmetric technology partnership formation”, PhD thesis, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta Finland.

4. Blomqvist, K. , Hurmelinna, P. and Seppanen, R. (2005), “Playing the collaboration game right balancing turst and contracting”, Technovation , Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 497-504.

5. Briz, J. and Felipe, I. (2007), “Challenge to SME to survive in food dynamic markets: innovation and efficient networks”, 1st International European Forum on Innovation and System Dynamics in Food Networks, European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE), Innsbruck-Igls.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3