Sensory analysis of 20% solids fortified blended porridge

Author:

Chambers IV Edgar,Maughan Curtis,Padmanabhan Natarajan,Alavi Sajid,Adedji Akinbode

Abstract

Purpose Evaluations of food aid products such as corn soy blend (CSB) suggest that higher nutrient-dense weaning foods are needed. CSB at 20 per cent solids was suggested, but it is too thick for weaning use. The purpose of this paper is to examine if high or low pressure extrusion or a change from corn to sorghum could reduce viscosity without major sensory changes compared to CSB, a widely used fortified blended food (FBF). Design/methodology/approach A 2×2 factorial design of grain (corn or sorghum) and extrusion pressure (low or high) was used to produce fortified extruded CSB and sorghum soy blend (SSB) that match new nutritional recommendations at 20 per cent solids. A control CSB sample was also produced. Porridge was made and a descriptive panel measured sensory properties and a Bostwick Consistometer determined viscosity. Findings Control CSB was thicker, lumpier, and stickier than the extruded samples. Sorghum samples had more sorghum flavour and corn samples had more corn flavour, but generally other flavour characteristics differed only slightly from the control product. None of the samples were as thin as recommended for infant swallowing, but the extruded sorghum samples were less viscous than other samples. Originality/value Nutrient-dense FBFs at high solids content have been recommended but not yet well tested. This paper provides a sensory examination of high solids FBFs with the potential for use as supplementary foods for infants and children.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference31 articles.

1. AOAC (2010), “Method 920.39: crude fat in feeds, cereal grains and forages, method 930.15: moisture determination, method 942.05: ash in feed and food, method 990.03: crude protein combustion method, method 996.11: total starch assay procedure”, in Horwitz, W. and Latimer, G. (Eds), Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed., AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.

2. AOCS (2009), “Approved procedure Ba 6a-05: crude fiber analysis in feeds by filter bag technique”, in Firestone, D. (Ed.), Official Methods and Recommended Practices, 6th ed., American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, IL.

3. Effect of preparation method on viscosity and energy density of fortified humanitarian food-aid commodities;International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition,2009

4. Tolerance testing for cooked porridge made from a sorghum-based fortified blended food;Journal of Food Science,2016

5. Novel fortified blended foods: preference testing with infants and young children in Tanzania and descriptive sensory analysis;Journal of Food Science,2018

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3