Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to develop a hybrid finite difference‐finite element method and apply it to solve the three‐dimensional energy equation in non‐isothermal fluid flow past over a tube.Design/methodology/approachTo implement the hybrid scheme, the tube length is partitioned into uniform segments by choosing grid points along its length, and a plane perpendicular to the tube axis is drawn at each of the points. Subsequently, the Taylor‐Galerkin finite element technique is employed to discretize the energy equation in the planes; while the derivatives along the tube are discretized using the finite difference method.FindingsTo demonstrate the validity of the proposed numerical scheme, three‐dimensional test cases have been solved using the method. The variation of L2‐norm of the error with mesh refinement shows that the numerical solution converges to the exact solution with mesh refinement. Moreover, comparison of the computational time duration shows that the proposed method is approximately three times faster than the 3D finite element method. In the non‐isothermal fluid flow around a tube for Re=250 and Pr=0.7, the results show that the Nusselt number decreases with the increase in the tube length and, for the tube length greater than six times the tube diameter, the average Nusselt number converges to the value for the two‐dimensional case.Originality/valueA hybrid finite difference‐finite element method has been developed and applied to solve the 3D transient energy equation for different test cases. The proposed method is faster, and computationally more efficient, compared with the 3D finite element method.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials
Reference19 articles.
1. Arefmanesh, A. and Afkhami, S. (2001), “A Taylor‐Galerkin/control volume model for the simulation of heat transfer with phase change in a fluid flow”, ISME, Proceedings of 5th International and 9th Annual Mechanical Engineering Conference, pp. 393‐400.
2. Baer, T.A., Cairncross, R.A., Schunk, P.R., Rao, R.R. and Sackinger, P.A. (2000), “A finite element method for free surface flows of incompressible fluids in three dimensions Part II dynamic wetting lines”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 33, pp. 405‐27.
3. Brooks, A.N. and Hughes, T.J.R. (1982), “Streamline‐upwind/Petrov‐Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier‐Stokes equations”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 32, pp. 199‐259.
4. Cairncross, R.A., Schunk, P.R., Baer, T.A., Rao, R.R. and Sackinger, P.A. (2000), “A finite element method for free surface flows of incompressible fluids in three dimensions Part I boundary fitted mesh motion”, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 33, pp. 375‐403.
5. Chen, B.F. (1998), “Hybrid three‐dimensional finite‐difference and finite‐element analysis of seismic wave induced fluid‐structure interaction of a vertical cylinder”, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 25, pp. 639‐59.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献