Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to explore the biodiversity reporting by the largest dairy company in China (the Yili Group). The authors use signalling theory, legitimacy theory, institutional theory and stakeholder theory to understand the Yili Group’s motivations to report biodiversity disclosures.
Design/methodology/approach
This study uses content analysis, guided by a biodiversity disclosure index, to explore and investigate the disclosure themes and tone for the stand-alone Yili Group biodiversity reports for the period 2017–2019. The content analysis is supplemented by a selection of interviews used to obtain additional insights into the Yili Group’s biodiversity reporting.
Findings
A gradual improvement is noted in the Yili Group’s biodiversity reporting over time, while the need for improvement remains as the Yili Group matures in its reporting. The company tends to report symbolic disclosures rather than substantive ones and is motivated more by external pressures and/or incentives than by morality and/or stakeholder accountability: this pushes the company towards more dominant symbolic biodiversity disclosure practices.
Practical implications
Findings are particularly relevant to the management of Chinese companies planning to publish biodiversity reports or enhance biodiversity disclosure practices as they draw attention to specific aspects of biodiversity reporting which require improvement. Improvements in biodiversity reporting provide a signal that such reporting is maturing and that organizations are recognizing the need for managing their biodiversity impact.
Social implications
Given that the Yili Group is a pioneer among Chinese firms in publishing biodiversity reports, this paper suggests other companies’ imitation of the Yili Group and helps promote the diffusion of biodiversity reporting in China. In addition, this paper provides a basis for a call for Chinese companies to strengthen their awareness and accountability regarding biodiversity and the conservation thereof.
Originality/value
This study is among the first to explore biodiversity reporting and disclosure in a China-based organization. While the study deals with one company, the findings are broadly applicable for other organizations seeking to undertake biodiversity accounting and reporting. Considering that biodiversity accounting is a research area which is still under-investigated, this paper aims to respond to the call of Jones and Solomon (2013) for pushing the boundaries in biodiversity accounting.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference111 articles.
1. Acca (2020), “Integrated reporting has been identified as a key method to help firms tackle future risks they face such as those posed by the covid-19 pandemic”, available at: www.accaglobal.com/us/en/news/2020/may/companies-promote-resource-efficiency-ACCA-ir.html (accessed 2020).
2. Adams, C. (2022), “What next? Agreement on a two-pillar approach to sustainability reporting”, available at: www.drcaroladams.net/what-next-agreement-on-a-two-pillar-approach-to-sustainability-reporting/ (accessed 2022).
3. Connecting the COVID-19 pandemic, environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing and calls for ‘harmonisation’ of sustainability reporting;Critical Perspectives on Accounting,2022
4. Biodiversity and threatened species reporting by the top fortune global companies;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2018
5. United Nations decade on biodiversity: a study of the reporting practices of the Australian mining industry;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2017
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献