Abstract
PurposeThis study comprehensively reviews the global literature on busy boards and audit committees.Design/methodology/approachSix eight articles on busy boards and audit committees from prominent accounting journals are reviewed and analyzed under the “reputation” and “busyness” premise.FindingsMost studies advocating the “reputation” hypothesis have the consensus that busy directors have their benefits (knowledge spillovers), particularly regarding sharing their in-depth knowledge, experiences and expertise. This phenomenon is pronounced for younger and IPO firms, which have high advising and financing needs. From the “busyness” perspective, busy directors are too overboard in carrying out their duty effectively and responsibly.Practical implicationsThis study identifies future research avenues on busy boards/audit committees and suggests that policymakers and regulators should limit the number of board appointments.Originality/valueThis is the first study to extensively amalgamate research on busy directors and audit committees. It reveals the various proxies used to measure the busyness of board and audit committee members and the consequences of busyness.
Reference80 articles.
1. Multiple directorships and acquirer returns;Journal of Banking and Finance,2010
2. Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during global financial crisis;Accounting and Finance,2012
3. Is busy really busy? Board governance revisited;Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,2013
4. The effect of multiple directorships on real and accrual-based earnings management;Accounting Research Journal,2016
5. Multiple directorships of board members and earnings management: an empirical evidence from French listed companies;Journal of Economic and Financial Modelling,2014